---

license: apache-2.0 tags: - gguf - qwen - qwen3 - qwen3-14b - qwen3-14b-gguf - llama.cpp - quantized - text-generation - reasoning - agent - multilingual - imatrix - q3_hifi - q4_hifi - q5_hifi base_model: Qwen/Qwen3-14B author: geoffmunn pipeline_tag: text-generation language: - en - zh - es - fr - de - ru - ar - ja - ko - hi

---

Qwen3-14B-f16-GGUF

This is a GGUF-quantized version of the Qwen/Qwen3-14B language model — a 14-billion-parameter LLM with deep reasoning, research-grade accuracy, and autonomous workflows. Converted for use with \llama.cpp\, LM Studio, OpenWebUI, GPT4All, and more.

Why Use a 14B Model?

The Qwen3-14B model delivers serious intelligence in a locally runnable package, offering near-flagship performance while remaining feasible to run on a single high-end consumer GPU or a well-equipped CPU setup. It’s the optimal choice when you need strong reasoning, robust code generation, and deep language understanding—without relying on the cloud or massive infrastructure.

Highlights:

• State-of-the-art performance among open 14B-class models, excelling in reasoning, math, coding, and multilingual tasks
• Efficient inference with quantization: runs on a 24 GB GPU (e.g., RTX 4090) or even CPU with quantized GGUF/AWQ variants (~12–14 GB RAM usage)
• Strong contextual handling: supports long inputs and complex multi-step workflows, ideal for agentic or RAG-based systems
• Fully open and commercially usable, giving you full control over deployment and customization

It’s ideal for:

• Self-hosted AI assistants that understand nuance, remember context, and generate high-quality responses
• On-prem development environments needing local code completion, documentation, or debugging
• Private RAG or enterprise applications requiring accuracy, reliability, and data sovereignty
• Researchers and developers seeking a powerful, open-weight alternative to closed 10B–20B models

Choose Qwen3-14B when you’ve outgrown 7B–8B models but still want to run efficiently offline—balancing capability, control, and cost without sacrificing quality.

Qwen3 14B Quantization Guide: Cross-Bit Summary & Recommendations

Executive Summary

At 14B scale, quantization quality is exceptional across all bit widths—models are inherently resilient to compression, with even Q3_K achieving near-lossless fidelity (+2.5% loss with imatrix). All variants deliver production-ready quality, making 14B the "sweet spot" where aggressive quantization meets robust model architecture. The choice depends entirely on your constraints:

Quantization	Best Variant (+ imatrix)	Quality vs F16	File Size	Speed	Memory
Q5K	Q5K_M + imatrix	+0.59% (best)	9.55 GiB	63.81 TPS	10,021 MiB
Q4K	Q4K_M + imatrix	+1.2%	8.38 GiB	72.89 TPS	8,581 MiB
Q3K	Q3K_HIFI + imatrix	+2.5%	7.93 GiB	63.93 TPS	8,120 MiB

💡 Critical insight: 14B models quantize superbly—even Q3KHIFI + imatrix achieves only +2.5% precision loss, making 3-bit quantization viable for production use. imatrix provides modest but valuable gains, though Q4KHIFI is uniquely harmed by imatrix (+0.6% degradation).

---

Bit-Width Recommendations by Use Case

✅ Quality-Critical Applications

→ Q5KM + imatrix

• Best perplexity at 9.0680 PPL (+0.59% vs F16) — near-lossless fidelity
• 64.4% memory reduction (10,021 MiB vs 28,170 MiB)
• 148% faster than F16 (63.81 TPS vs 25.73 TPS)
• Standard llama.cpp compatibility — no custom builds needed
• ⚠️ Avoid Q5KHIFI — provides no measurable advantage over Q5KM (+0.02% worse with imatrix) while requiring custom build and 2.3% more memory

⚖️ Best Overall Balance (Recommended Default)

→ Q4KM + imatrix

• Excellent +1.2% precision loss vs F16 (PPL 9.1247)
• Strong 72.89 TPS speed (+183% vs F16)
• Compact 8.38 GiB file size (69.5% smaller than F16)
• Standard llama.cpp compatibility — universal toolchain support
• Ideal for most development and production scenarios

🚀 Maximum Speed / Minimum Size

→ Q3KS + imatrix

• Fastest variant at 91.32 TPS (+255% vs F16)
• Smallest footprint at 6.19 GiB (77.5% memory reduction)
• Acceptable +6.5% precision loss with imatrix (unusable at +7.7% without)
• ⚠️ Never use Q3KS without imatrix — quality degrades severely

📱 Extreme Memory Constraints (< 8 GiB)

→ Q3KS + imatrix

• Absolute smallest runtime at 6,339 MiB
• Only viable option under 8 GiB budget
• +6.5% quality loss acceptable for non-critical tasks

💎 Near-Lossless 3-Bit Option

→ Q3KHIFI + imatrix

• Surprisingly good quality at +2.5% loss — production-ready for Q3
• 71.2% memory reduction (8,120 MiB)
• Unique value: When you need Q3 size/speed but can't accept Q3KS quality
• ⚠️ 23% slower than Q3KM — significant speed trade-off

---

Critical Warnings for 14B Scale

⚠️ Q4KHIFI + imatrix is counterproductive — imatrix degrades quality by +0.6% (9.0847 → 9.1393 PPL). This is unique to 14B scale.

• Without imatrix: Q4KHIFI is best Q4 quality (+0.8% vs F16)
• With imatrix: Q4KM is best Q4 quality (+1.2% vs F16)
• Never use imatrix with Q4KHIFI at 14B

⚠️ Q5KHIFI provides zero advantage at 14B:

• Quality is worse than Q5KM with imatrix (+0.61% vs +0.59%)
• Costs +467 MiB memory (+4.8% overhead) and requires custom build
• Skip it entirely — Q5KM is strictly superior for production use

⚠️ All Q3K variants are production-ready — even Q3K_S with imatrix (+6.5% loss) remains usable, a dramatic improvement over smaller scales where Q3 often fails.

• Q3KHIFI without imatrix: +2.6% loss (excellent)
• Q3KM with imatrix: +2.9% loss (excellent)
• This is the smallest scale where Q3 quantization is reliably viable

⚠️ imatrix impact is minimal at 14B — Unlike smaller models where imatrix recovers 60–78% of lost precision, at 14B the gains are modest (0.1–2.6%):

• Q5K variants: +1.1–1.3% improvement
• Q4KM: +0.1% improvement (negligible)
• Q4KS: +0.5% improvement
• Q3K_HIFI: -0.1% (no change — already near-perfect)

---

Memory Budget Guide

Available VRAM	Recommended Variant	Expected Quality	Why
< 6.5 GiB	Q3KS + imatrix	PPL 9.60, +6.5% loss	Only option that fits; quality acceptable for non-critical tasks
6.5 – 8.2 GiB	Q3KM + imatrix	PPL 9.28, +2.9% loss ✅	Best Q3 balance; production-ready quality
8.2 – 10.1 GiB	Q4KM + imatrix	PPL 9.12, +1.2% loss ✅	Best overall balance; standard compatibility
10.1 – 12.0 GiB	Q5KM + imatrix	PPL 9.07, +0.59% loss ✅	Near-lossless quality; best precision available
> 12.0 GiB	Q5KM + imatrix or F16	PPL 9.07 or 9.01	F16 only if absolute precision required

---

Cross-Bit Performance Comparison

Priority	Q3K Best	Q4K Best	Q5_K Best	Winner
Quality (with imat)	Q3KHIFI (+2.5%)	Q4KM (+1.2%)	Q5KM (+0.59%) ✅	Q5KM
Quality (no imat)	Q3KHIFI (+2.6%)	Q4KHIFI (+0.8%) ✅	Q5KS (+1.84%)	Q4KHIFI
Speed	Q3KS (91.32 TPS) ✅	Q4KS (76.34 TPS)	Q5KS (65.40 TPS)	Q3KS
Smallest Size	Q3KS (6.19 GiB) ✅	Q4KS (7.98 GiB)	Q5KS (9.33 GiB)	Q3KS
Best Balance	Q3KM + imat	Q4KM + imat ✅	Q5KM + imat	Q4KM

✅ = Recommended for general use ⚠️ = Context-dependent (see warnings above)

---

Scale-Specific Insights: Why 14B Quantizes So Well

1. Model redundancy threshold: 14B represents the inflection point where parameter count provides sufficient redundancy that quantization errors average out rather than accumulating. Below 8B, quality degrades more rapidly; above 14B, gains plateau.
2. Q3K viability threshold: 14B is the smallest scale where Q3KHIFI achieves truly production-ready quality (+2.5% with imatrix). At 8B, Q3KHIFI is +3.5%; at 4B, +5.9%; at 1.7B, +3.4% but with much higher baseline PPL.
3. imatrix diminishing returns: At 14B, imatrix effectiveness plateaus — Q3KHIFI improves by only 0.1%, Q4KM by 0.1%, Q5K variants by 1.1–1.3%. This contrasts sharply with 0.6B (40–48% recovery) and 1.7B (60–78% recovery).
4. Q4KHIFI paradox: Unlike at 8B (where imatrix helps Q4KHIFI by -1.1%) or 32B (where it helps by -0.7%), at 14B imatrix harms Q4KHIFI (+0.6%). This demonstrates non-linear scale effects in quantization behavior.
5. Q5KHIFI irrelevance: At 14B, residual quantization provides no measurable benefit — the model's inherent robustness makes the extra precision unnecessary. This changes at 32B where Q5KHIFI + imatrix achieves F16-equivalence.

---

Decision Flowchart

Need best quality?
├─ Yes → Q5KM + imatrix (+0.59% loss)
└─ No → Need smallest size/speed?
     ├─ Yes → Memory < 8 GiB? 
     │        ├─ Yes → Q3KS + imatrix (6,339 MiB, +6.5% loss)
     │        └─ No  → Q4KS + imatrix (8,172 MiB, +1.4% loss, 76.34 TPS)
     └─ No  → Q4KM + imatrix (best balance, +1.2% loss, standard build)

---

Practical Deployment Recommendations

For Most Users

→ Q4KM + imatrix Delivers excellent quality (+1.2% vs F16), strong speed (72.89 TPS), compact size (8.38 GiB), and universal llama.cpp compatibility. The safe, practical choice for 90% of deployments.

For Quality-Critical Work

→ Q5KM + imatrix Achieves near-lossless quantization (+0.59% vs F16) with 64% memory reduction and 2.5× speedup. Standard compatibility makes it preferable to Q5KHIFI, which offers no advantage.

For Edge/Mobile Deployment

→ Q3KM + imatrix Best Q3 quality (+2.9% vs F16) with smallest viable footprint (6,973 MiB). Production-ready even without imatrix (+5.7% loss) — valuable for environments where imatrix generation isn't feasible.

For High-Throughput Serving

→ Q3KS + imatrix Fastest variant (91.32 TPS, +255% vs F16) with acceptable quality (+6.5% loss). Ideal when every TPS matters and marginal quality differences are acceptable.

For Research on Quantization Limits

→ Q3KHIFI + imatrix Demonstrates that 3-bit quantization can achieve near-lossless quality (+2.5% loss) on sufficiently large models. Valuable for characterizing the lower bounds of viable quantization.

---

Bottom Line Recommendations

Scenario	Recommended Variant	Rationale
Default / General Purpose	Q4KM + imatrix	Best balance of quality, speed, size, and compatibility
Maximum Quality	Q5KM + imatrix	Near-lossless (+0.59% vs F16) with standard toolchain
Minimum Size	Q3KS + imatrix	Smallest footprint (6.19 GiB) with acceptable quality
Maximum Speed	Q3KS + imatrix	Fastest (91.32 TPS) at 3.6× F16 speed
No imatrix available	Q4KHIFI (no imat)	Best quality without imatrix (+0.8% vs F16)
Extreme constraints	Q3KS + imatrix	Only if memory < 8 GiB; +6.5% loss acceptable

⚠️ Golden rules for 14B:

1. Never use imatrix with Q4KHIFI — it degrades quality
2. Skip Q5KHIFI entirely — no advantage over Q5KM
3. All three bit widths are viable — choose based on constraints, not quality cliffs
4. Q3_K is production-ready — the first scale where 3-bit quantization reliably works

✅ 14B is the quantization resilience milestone: Large enough for robustness across all bit widths, small enough for dramatic efficiency gains. This scale demonstrates that intelligent quantization can deliver near-F16 quality at 1/3 the memory with 2.5–3.5× speed — a compelling value proposition for nearly all deployments.

Non-technical model anaysis and rankings

NOTE: This analysis does not include the HIFI models.

There are two good candidates: Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3KS and Qwen3-14B-f16:Q5KM. These cover the full range of temperatures and are good at all question types.

Another good option would be Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3KM, with good finishes across the temperature range.

Qwen3-14B-f16:Q2_K got very good results and would have been a 1st or 2nd place candidate but was the only model to fail the 'hello' question which it should have passed.

You can read the results here: Qwen3-14b-analysis.md

If you find this useful, please give the project a ❤️ like.

Non-HIFI recommentation table based on output

Level	Speed	Size	Recommendation
Q2_K	⚡ Fastest	5.75 GB	An excellent option but it failed the 'hello' test. Use with caution.
🥇 Q3KS	⚡ Fast	6.66 GB	🥇 Best overall model. Two first places and two 3rd places. Excellent results across the full temperature range.
🥉 Q3KM	⚡ Fast	7.32 GB	🥉 A good option - it came 1st and 3rd, covering both ends of the temperature range.
Q4KS	🚀 Fast	8.57 GB	Not recommended, two 2nd places in low temperature questions with no other appearances.
Q4KM	🚀 Fast	9.00 GB	Not recommended. A single 3rd place with no other appearances.
🥈 Q5KS	🐢 Medium	10.3 GB	🥈 A very good second place option. A top 3 finisher across the full temperature range.
Q5KM	🐢 Medium	10.5 GB	Not recommended. A single 3rd place with no other appearances.
Q6_K	🐌 Slow	12.1 GB	Not recommended. No top 3 finishes at all.
Q8_0	🐌 Slow	15.7 GB

Not recommended. A single 2nd place with no other appearances.

Build notes

All of these models were built using these commands:

mkdir build
cmake -B build -DCMAKEBUILDTYPE=Release -DGGMLNATIVE=ON -DGGMLAVX=ON -DGGMLAVX2=ON -DGGMLCUDA=ON -DGGMLVULKAN=OFF -DLLAMACURL=OFF
cmake --build build --config Release -j

NOTE: Vulkan support is specifically turned off here. Vulkan performance was much worse, so if you want Vulkan support you can rebuild these models yourself.

The HIFI quantization also used a very large 4697 chunk imatrix file for extra precision. You can re-use it here: Qwen3-14B-f16-imatrix-4697-generic.gguf

The imatrix was created as a generic mix of Wikipedia, mathmatics, and coding examples.

Source code

You can use the HIFI GitHub repository to build it from source if you're interested: https://github.com/geoffmunn/llama.cpp.

Build notes: HIFIBUILD_GUIDE.md

Improvements and feedback are welcome.

Usage

Load this model using:

• OpenWebUI – self-hosted AI interface with RAG & tools
• LM Studio – desktop app with GPU support and chat templates
• GPT4All – private, local AI chatbot (offline-first)
• Or directly via llama.cpp

Each quantized model includes its own README.md and shares a common MODELFILE for optimal configuration.

Importing directly into Ollama should work, but you might encounter this error: Error: invalid character '<' looking for beginning of value.
In this case try these steps:

1. wget https://huggingface.co/geoffmunn/Qwen3-14B/resolve/main/Qwen3-14B-f16%3AQ3KS.gguf (replace the quantised version with the one you want)
2. nano Modelfile and enter these details (again, replacing Q3KS with the version you want):

FROM ./Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3KS.gguf

Chat template using ChatML (used by Qwen)
SYSTEM You are a helpful assistant

TEMPLATE "{{ if .System }}<|im_start|>system
{{ .System }}<|imend|>{{ end }}<|imstart|>user
{{ .Prompt }}<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
"
PARAMETER stop <|im_start|>
PARAMETER stop <|im_end|>

Default sampling
PARAMETER temperature 0.6
PARAMETER top_p 0.95
PARAMETER top_k 20
PARAMETER min_p 0.0
PARAMETER repeat_penalty 1.1
PARAMETER num_ctx 4096

The num_ctx value has been dropped to increase speed significantly.

1. Then run this command: ollama create Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3KS -f Modelfile

You will now see "Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3KS" in your Ollama model list.

These import steps are also useful if you want to customise the default parameters or system prompt.

Author

👤 Geoff Munn (@geoffmunn)
🔗 Hugging Face Profile

Disclaimer

This is a community conversion for local inference. Not affiliated with Alibaba Cloud or the Qwen team.