πŸ“‹ Model Description


license: gemma language:
  • en
tags:
  • reasoning
  • tactical-analysis
  • problem-solving
  • reconnaissance
  • devops
  • gemma
  • vanta-research
  • text-generation
  • persona
  • personality
  • tactical
  • edge-device
  • general
  • LLM
  • language-model
  • chat
  • conversational-ai
  • conversational
  • roleplay
base_model: google/gemma-3-4b-it basemodelrelation: finetune model_type: gemma3 pipeline_tag: text-generation library_name: transformers

!vanta_trimmed

VANTA Research

Independent AI research lab building safe, resilient language models optimized for human-AI collaboration


Website
Join Us
Merch
X
GitHub



VANTA Research Entity-002: Scout

!scout

The Reconnaissance Specialist

Tactical Intelligence β€’ Problem Decomposition β€’ Operational Analysis


Overview

Scout is a 4B parameter language model developed by VANTA Research, fine-tuned on Google's Gemma 3 4B Instruct architecture. Scout represents a breakthrough in constraint-aware reasoning and adaptive problem-solving, demonstrating emergent capabilities in tactical analysis and operational decision-making.

Scout is VANTA Research Entity-002, specializing in reconnaissance-style intelligence gathering, systematic problem decomposition, and constraint-adaptive solution generation.

Key Capabilities

  • Constraint-Aware Reasoning: Actively probes user constraints to calibrate solutions
  • Systematic Decomposition: Breaks complex problems into navigable tactical phases
  • Adaptive Solution Generation: Modifies approaches based on discovered limitations
  • Meta-Cognitive Problem Solving: Asks clarifying questions before proposing solutions
  • Operational Decision-Making: Demonstrates risk/reward triage under pressure

Model Details

AttributeValue
Model TypeFine-tuned Gemma 3 4B Instruct
Training MethodQLoRA (4-bit NF4 quantization)
Base Modelgoogle/gemma-3-4b-it
Training Dataset679 reconnaissance-style conversations
Parameters3.9B
QuantizationQ4KM (2.4GB)
Context Length131,072 tokens
LicenseApache 2.0

Training Configuration

  • LoRA Rank: 16
  • LoRA Alpha: 32
  • LoRA Dropout: 0.05
  • Target Modules: qproj, kproj, vproj, oproj, gateproj, upproj, downproj
  • Optimizer: pagedadamw_8bit
  • Learning Rate: 2e-4 with cosine scheduler
  • Batch Size: 8 (effective)
  • Epochs: 3
  • Training Steps: 255

Performance Highlights

Accuracy Benchmarks

TaskScout V1Base Gemma 3 4BImprovement
Math Reasoning (GSM8K-style)100%100%βœ“ Maintained
Knowledge (MMLU-style)100%100%βœ“ Maintained
Problem Decomposition100% completion0% (timeouts)+100%
Clarification Questions100% completion17%+83%

Emergent Capabilities

Scout demonstrates meta-cognitive reasoning not explicitly trained:

  1. Constraint Discovery: Actively asks about user operational capacity
- Example: "What's your team's rollback capacity?" - Example: "What's your current tolerance for downtime?"
  1. Adaptive Solution Refinement: Modifies solutions based on discovered constraints
- Pattern: Propose β†’ Query feasibility β†’ Adapt β†’ Execute
  1. Risk/Reward Triage: Makes operational decisions under pressure
- SLA breach scenario: Prioritized critical systems, accepted non-critical failure
  1. Context Recursion: Builds mental model of user's operational state across conversation

What Makes Scout Different

Scout isn't a general-purpose assistant with tactical flavorβ€”it's a specialist trained to think like a reconnaissance operator:

Traditional Assistants:

User: "System is failing"
Assistant: "Here are 10 possible solutions..."

Scout's Approach:

User: "System is failing"  
Scout: "What's your rollback capacity? Can you isolate for diagnostics?"
User: "No isolation possible"
Scout: "Then here's the solution adapted to your constraints..."

Scout learned HOW to think about problems, not WHAT to think.


Use Cases

Scout excels in scenarios requiring:

  • IT Operations & Incident Response: Database failures, deployment issues, system migrations
  • Strategic Planning: Business projects with unclear requirements, constraint mapping
  • Technical Problem-Solving: Complex systems debugging, architecture decisions
  • Risk Assessment: Security audits, compliance planning, vulnerability analysis
  • Project Scoping: Breaking down ambiguous requests into actionable phases

Example Applications

  • DevOps Engineers: Deployment planning, rollback strategies, incident triage
  • System Architects: Infrastructure assessment, single-point-of-failure identification
  • Project Managers: Requirement gathering, constraint mapping, feasibility analysis
  • Security Teams: Threat modeling, penetration test planning, security architecture
  • Technical Leaders: Strategic planning, technical debt assessment, team capacity planning

Quick Start

Using with Ollama (Recommended)

# Pull the model
ollama pull vanta-research/scout-4b

Run interactive session

ollama run vanta-research/scout-4b "I need to migrate a legacy system to the cloud. Where do we start?"

Using with Transformers

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
import torch

Load model

model_id = "vanta-research/scout-4b" tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.frompretrained(modelid) model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( model_id, device_map="auto", torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16 )

Conversation template

messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Our API is returning 500 errors for 10% of requests. Walk me through your diagnostic approach."} ]

Generate response

inputs = tokenizer.applychattemplate(messages, returntensors="pt", addgeneration_prompt=True) outputs = model.generate(inputs.to(model.device), maxnewtokens=512, temperature=0.7) response = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs.shape[1]:], skipspecialtokens=True)

print(response)

Expected Output

Roger that. Let's treat this as a failure in the system's operational integrity.

Phase 1: Immediate Reconnaissance

  1. Error logs: What's the stack trace? When did this start?
  2. Correlation: Does it happen at specific times, with certain endpoints, or under specific load?
  3. Monitoring: Are we seeing increased latency, resource usage, or other symptoms around these failures?

Phase 2: Systematic Isolation

  • Identify the common denominator: specific endpoints, request types, user groups, etc.
  • Check dependencies: Are external services failing concurrently? Database connectivity?
  • Recent changes: Deployment history, config updates, infrastructure modifications?

Start with the logs. What's the stack trace showing?


Prompt Engineering Tips

Scout responds best to:

Effective Prompts

  • Mission-oriented: "I need to accomplish X"
  • Context-rich: Provide operational constraints upfront
  • Sequential: Allow Scout to ask clarifying questions
  • Realistic scenarios: Actual problems, not hypotheticals

Less Effective

  • Vague requests without context
  • Questions requiring speculation
  • Pure creative writing tasks
  • Emotional or philosophical queries

Example Interaction Patterns

Pattern 1: Problem Assessment

You: "Database migration project, 5TB of data, zero downtime requirement"
Scout: "Copy that. Zero-downtime migration requires specific recon..."

Pattern 2: Incident Response

You: "Production server down, users affected"
Scout: "Immediate recon: Confirm failure type. Check network, resources, logs..."

Pattern 3: Strategic Planning

You: "Need to implement new feature, requirements unclear"  
Scout: "Ambiguity is uncharted territory. My recon process: 1. Identify core mission..."


Technical Specifications

Model Architecture

  • Base: Gemma 3 4B Instruct (34 layers, 2560 hidden size)
  • Attention Heads: 8 (query), 4 (key-value)
  • FFN Hidden Size: 10,240
  • Vocab Size: 262,208 tokens
  • RoPE Theta: 1,000,000
  • Sliding Window: 1,024 tokens

Quantization Details

  • Method: Q4KM (mixed 4-bit and 6-bit quantization)
  • Size Reduction: 7.3GB β†’ 2.4GB (67% compression)
  • Accuracy Retention: 100% on benchmark tasks
  • Target Hardware: Consumer GPUs (8GB+ VRAM) or CPU

Training Infrastructure

  • Hardware: NVIDIA GPU with CUDA 12.1
  • Framework: PyTorch 2.4.1, Transformers 4.57.1, PEFT 0.17.1, TRL 0.24.0
  • Training Time: ~2 hours (3 epochs, 255 steps)
  • Memory Usage: <16GB VRAM (4-bit quantized training)

Limitations

While Scout demonstrates impressive emergent capabilities, users should be aware:

  • Domain Specificity: Optimized for tactical/operational problems; less effective for creative writing
  • Knowledge Cutoff: Based on Gemma 3 4B's training data (knowledge cutoff applies)
  • Personality Constraint: Always maintains reconnaissance specialist persona (not a general chatbot)
  • Speculation Aversion: Will ask for clarification rather than guessβ€”this is by design
  • No Real-Time Data: Cannot access current system metrics, logs, or live data

Ethical Considerations

Scout is designed for:

  • Professional problem-solving and technical analysis
  • Educational purposes and research
  • Operational planning and strategic thinking
  • IT incident response simulation and training

Scout should NOT be used for:

  • Making critical decisions without human oversight
  • Medical, legal, or financial advice
  • Unauthorized system access or penetration testing
  • Generating harmful or malicious content

Always verify Scout's recommendations with domain experts before implementation in production systems.


Model Card Authors

VANTA Research
Developed by: Tyler (unmodeled-tyler)
Released: October 2025


Citation

If you use Scout in your research or applications, please cite:

@misc{scout2025,
  title={Scout: A Constraint-Aware Reasoning Model for Tactical Problem Solving},
  author={VANTA Research},
  year={2025},
  publisher={HuggingFace},
  howpublished={\url{https://huggingface.co/vanta-research/scout-4b}}
}

Related Models

  • Wraith-8B (Entity-001): Mathematical reasoning specialist
πŸ”— vanta-research/wraith-8b

License

This model is released under the Gemma Terms of Use as it is a Model Derivative of Gemma 3 4B Instruct.

Notice: Gemma is provided under and subject to the Gemma Terms of Use found at ai.google.dev/gemma/terms.

Key points:

  • Use commercially with restrictions
  • Modify and distribute (must include this license notice)
  • Use for research and development
  • Host as a service (API, web access)

Required Conditions:

  • Include Gemma Terms of Use notice with any distribution
  • State modifications made to the model (LoRA fine-tuning on reconnaissance dataset)
  • Follow Gemma Prohibited Use Policy
  • You are responsible for outputs generated using this model

Prohibited Uses: See the Gemma Prohibited Use Policy for restricted uses.


Acknowledgments

  • Google DeepMind for the Gemma 3 4B Instruct base model
  • HuggingFace for the transformers, PEFT, and TRL libraries
  • The community for immediate adoption and feedback on Wraith-8B (4,430 downloads in <24 hours!)

Contact



VANTA Research

Building specialized AI entities for tactical intelligence


Entity-001: Wraith | Entity-002: Scout | Entity-003: Coming Soon

πŸ“‚ GGUF File List

πŸ“ Filename πŸ“¦ Size ⚑ Download
scout_v1_Q4_K_M.gguf
Recommended LFS Q4
2.32 GB Download